Written By: Tehreem Humayon
Email: tehreem1220@gmail.com
Introduction
Ecosystems are highly complex systems of interdependent organisms, each of them having a different function. Of these, some have a relatively large impact on the environment in which they live compared with their abundance or biomass. Such species are known as keystone species. The term 'keystone species' was introduced by the American ecologist Robert Paine in the 1960s to demonstrate how the removal of only one species from an ecosystem can noticeably and significantly impact structure and stability.
Historical Context of Keystone Species
The term "keystone species" was coined by Paine in 1969 from his early work on intertidal ecosystems. Paine noticed that when the sea star, Pisaster ochraceous, was removed, there was a dramatic decline in species diversity due to mussels that would, without predation, be able to monopolize space and resources. This study showed how some species play a critical role in regulating community dynamics and maintaining biodiversity. Paine did much to underpin the knowledge base of how keystone species function as linchpins for their ecosystems, holding the fine balance of species interactions together.
Figure 1: Food web of species present in temperate intertidal ecosystem.
Figure 2: Effect of removal of top predator on total species number in intertidal ecosystem.
Types of Keystone Species
Key stone species are generally categorized into three types, with each type consisting of a species group that contributes differently to the stability of the ecosystem. The three main categories are as follows:
Keystone Predators
Key Stone species play one of the important roles in maintaining ecological balance of the ecosystem, by controlling the numbers of prey species. A gray wolf (Canis lupus) in Yellowstone National Park is a prime example of this. Elk numbers were greatly increasing for the past few years, leading to overgrazing and a reduction of vegetation. To keep the numbers of elks down, wolves were reintroduced in the mid-1990s. The result of this was subsequent recovery of the vegetation for other species and re-establishment of ecological balance.
Figure 3: The gray wolf (Canis lupus), a keystone species in Yellowstone National Park.
Figure 4: The elk (Cervus canadensis), principal prey of gray wolves (Canis lupus).
Ecosystem Engineers
Ecosystem engineers are species that significantly alter their environment to create opportunities for other life. Beavers (Castor canadensis), as an example, are protrudes of this function. Dams offer great habitat for many different plant and animal species of wetland or riparian community that beavers create. The wetlands serve as a place that controls flooding, improves water quality and enhances biodiversity. Beavers' modifications to the landscape have a costly provenance, but they benefit various fish, amphibians (by creating clearer waters), birds and mammals alike, underlining the primacy of that process in their environment.
Keystone Mutualists
Keystone Mutualists are the species who maintain stability of the ecosystem by their interaction with other organisms to their benefit. In the traditional view, bees were seen to be essential pollinators for many flowering plants that support plant diversity and reproduction. Bee population decline is linked to decreased plant diversity and loss of herbivores. This demonstrates the key role that mutualistic relationships play in ensuring ecosystem functioning and biodiversity.
Mechanisms of Influence
Keystone species use a variety of strategies to impact their surroundings, such as habitat alteration and trophic cascades.
Trophic Cascades
Population shifts in one species lead to trophic cascades, causing consequential impacts on other populations further down the food chain. The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone is one most often cited, as the presence of an apex predator helped other organisms by limiting herbivore numbers and providing vegetation rebound. Absence of top predators like sharks in marine habitats can lead to an overpopulation of herbivores such as sea urchins, which devastates seagrass beds and disrupts the equilibrium within entire marine community.
Habitat Modification
Keystone species often modify their environment so the changes are favorable to other types of organisms. Coral reefs, as an example of keystone structures built by coral polyps provide resources and habitat for all kinds of marine life. Pollution, overfishing and climate change are largely responsible for the damage caused to reefs, leading to further damage to ecosystems health and marine biodiversity.
Consequences of Keystone Species Loss
Extinction of keystone species has a great bearing on the changes in ecological consequences with respect to reduced biodiversity, changed system functions, and even the collapse of ecosystems.
Ecosystem Imbalance and Decline
If a keystone species is taken away, the entire structure of an ecosystem can waiver, causing secondary extinctions and changes in what makes up different communities. A stark example: sea otters disappeared from the North Pacific because of hunting. Without otters to eat sea urchins, the kelp forests are over-grazed and destroyed by these herbivores - putting all species that depend on them at risk. Such examples illustrate that, by removing a single keystone species from an ecosystem can be enough to destroy it.
Biodiversity Loss
Keystone species are extremely important to the maintenance of biodiversity. Their presence allows other species to survive by way of maintaining the structure of the ecosystem. If the keystone species is removed, particular species may become more dominant, thus overall biodiversity is reduced because of a loss of regulating functions performed by the keystone species. That is worrying for habitats in which factors like habitat destruction, climate change, and human activity already pose a threat to biodiversity.
Figure 5 : Loss of keystone (apex predator) results in an ecosystem that lacks diversity.
Case Studies of Species Loss
Paine's work on sea stars showed an initial loss of a keystone predator that resulted in a monoculture of mussels, showing that species richness in the intertidal zone was considerably lowered. Likewise, following the fall of large predators like wolves and lions, overabundance of herbivores has caused habitat degradation, leading to a loss of biodiversity in certain ecosystems. These examples show the role that keystone species have in maintaining the diversity and balance of ecosystems.
Figure 6: Conceptual diagram illustrating how the loss of a keystone species cascades throughout an ecosystem.
Conservation Implications and Strategies
Understanding the role of keystone species in developing effective conservation strategies is important. Their protection can ensure stability and biodiversity; hence, their conservation becomes a priority for environmental management.
Habitat Protection
Setting up protected areas is an important way to protect the habitats of keystone species and communities depending on them. In these sanctuaries, keystone species will be free to continue with their roles of ensuring ecosystem stability.
Restoration Projects
In cases of the simplest disturbance, active restoration of keystone species populations can restore ecological balance. The successful reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park is a prime example of how the recovery of a keystone predator is able to restore entire ecosystems. Such restorations are currently being undertaken across the globe to reintroduce these keystone species into ravaged ecosystems.
Public Awareness and Education
Keystone species are very important, and there is a need for the establishment of an awareness program among people for the public to accept conservation programs. This can include awareness campaigns by emphasizing the importance of such species toward the maintenance of species richness and health of the ecosystems, which will prompt the local people to take interest in the conservation programs.
Policy and Legislation
Long-term conservation success depends on the establishment and enforcement of environmental legislation for the protection of keystone species and their ecosystems. This includes legislation controlling the levels of fishing, hunting, and land uses that are a threat to keystone species, but also the promotion of international collaboration on some of the global challenges like climate change, which is a serious threat to many keystone species and their ecosystems worldwide.
Conclusion
Keystone species are fundamental to Ecosystems. They help maintain intricate species interactions and influence the broader ecological community as well their immediate environments. This poses the need for the protection of species that if allowed to go extinct, cause repercussions which may put ecosystems in danger. This is important not just for biodiversity, but also because the protection of such species acts as an insurance policy against environmental change. To keep the natural world in balance and preserve living variety on Earth, we will have to take into account keystone species requirements as well as existential global tendencies such as habitat destruction, greenhouse gas emission and loss of biodiversity.
Bibliography
Wagner, Stephen C. “Keystone Species | Learn Science at Scitable.” Nature.com, 2010, www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/keystone-species-15786127/.
Rejuba Pongen. “Keystone Species: Ecological Architects of Biodiversity and Stability: Review.” International Journal of Science and Research Archive, vol. 11, no. 1, Feb. 2024, pp. 1137–52, https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0175.
Beforest. “The ‘Key’ Role of Keystone Species in Ecosystem Survival.” Beforest, 1 Sept. 2023, beforest.co/blogs/the-key-role-of-keystone-species-in-ecosystem-survival/. Accessed 2 Aug. 2024.
Melissa Denchak. “Keystone Species 101.” NRDC, 9 Sept. 2019, www.nrdc.org/stories/keystone-species-101#:~:text=for%20other%20species.-.
Bond, W. J. “Keystone Species.” Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, vol. 99, 1994, pp. 237–53, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58001-7_11.
Jordán, Ferenc. “Keystone Species and Food Webs.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364, no. 1524, June 2009, pp. 1733–41, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0335.
Chakraborty, Subhendu, et al. “Toxic Phytoplankton as a Keystone Species in Aquatic Ecosystems: Stable Coexistence to Biodiversity.” Oikos, vol. 125, no. 5, June 2015, pp. 735–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02322.
Cottee-Jones, Henry Eden W., and Robert J. Whittaker. “Perspective: The Keystone Species Concept: A Critical Appraisal.” Frontiers of Biogeography, vol. 4, no. 3, Sept. 2012, https://doi.org/10.21425/f5fbg12533.
댓글